| AID-India Conference 99, Chennai |
| Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article | ||
| Koodankulam Nuclear Reactor: Cause for Alarm | ||||
| S.P. Udayakumar | ||||
| I would like to thank Aravinda
for encouraging me to come here. I am a research fellow at the Institute
on Race and Poverty at the University of Minnesota. I also write
for newspapers. Following Dr. Parameswara Rao’s advice, to change
the attitude of people towards our government, when the BJP government
came to power, Mr. N Ram of Frontline and some professors in Delhi, and
I formed a group called BJP government watch. We have a website which
you can look at www.bjpgovernmentwatch.org.
I am a citizen from Nagercoil , Kanyakumari district. Ever since the Koodankulam project was devised I have been panic stricken because I don’t believe in the pattern of modernization and development that our nation state is pursuing. In the 1980s my friends and I formed a Group for a Peaceful Indian Ocean. We sought to educate the public opinion on the dangers of nuclear power plants and radioactive contamination. However, the thoughtless persistence of the government, remarkable indifference of local lawmakers and public figures, and high degree of nuclear illiteracy among our people in that part of India have contributed to the consolidation of the projects, and we have obviously lost. We were told that this project would bring increased job opportunities, enhanced growth of the region, and improve power generation. Anyone who comes from that region will know about the increased job opportunities, they are not for the masses that earn 30-50 rupees per day. Enhanced growth – Kanyakumari remains the same, and I think it will remain the same because the money will not be spend on the masses and so forth. Now about power generation. I have been talking in Delhi, talking to a lot of the elitest sections of the society. Most people have been indifferent, some people have suggested to me covertly and overtly that nuclear power is not a bad idea and they are not concerned about it. As we know some of these claims are misleading and quite inordinate. Since I am living in the US for the time being I cannot help comparing with what is going on in that country. I hate to compare as we see that for every single thing India looks to the west, especially the US. But for this point I think it is quite relevant. Commonwealth Edison is the largest private nuclear power company in the US. They have closed 2 nuclear plants in Illinois because of economic reasons. Another plant was shut down last year due to safety concerns. Only 4 of the company’s 12 plants are now currently generating electricity. Northeast Utilities is another company in Waterford CT. That company has also suspended plans to reopen one of its facilities. These and other companies are closing existing plants and refusing to open new plants for two reasons, one is cost and another is safety. If these reasons affect one of the wealthiest countries, then what will be India’s position? Besides industry problems there are considerations of storing the spent fuel and final decommissioning of the plant. These are dangerous considerations when a small lapse can affect millions of lives. Even if we suppose our plants are so effective that they overcome all
these difficulties.
Gabriele: It is very good if you people go there but you should know what you are letting yourself in for. I am not so pessimistic as you are that nothing can prevent this. It has been an extremely hot issue since the coastal march in 1989. The local population of Koodankulam had said it wanted the reactor, because of employment, etc. People in Kanyakumari resist, but even Kanyakumari people have cold feet. There was a shoot out in 1989 when we have the coastal march of the National Fishworkers Forum. The final procession was disrupted by sending in a private bus. Stone throwing, police firing. People were very badly injured. Since then the fishworkers movement was also setback. It was very difficult to rehabilitate the families of the fishermen. But even if you go now I will not be surprised if you are also beaten up. The local population is not keen on you. There is a strong BJP locally. We have sent such teams, who have also been beaten up. They came back minus their cameras and eyeglasses. They were also kidnapped. So I am not frightening you I am just saying that anything can happen and it is good if you people know what you are in for. We are working on the issue in NAPM. We have had a workshop. At the public level it is low key right now for these reasons which I am telling you. We also had a one day seminar on this issue. There is a lot of expert opinion to substantiate the things that Udaykumar is saying, and evidence of how un-economic it is. Politically this is a sacred cow, you are touching a very sensitive issue. But it is very good if this is done. It needs to be done. Sailesh: For a normal mind it looks very logical that this project might be stopped. But do you think the people there are so moronic to go ahead if there are all these problems? Are we as ordinary people to judge something like this? Mohan: I want to make two comments. I was here with
a team of German experts who had been asked to come to one of our nuclear
plants to see how safe it was. So we had breakfast together and they
said, we will see you in the evening we will be spending the day in the
place. But then I saw them at lunch and I said, what are you doing
here already?
Sailesh: There have not been any problems with Russian
reactors so far.
Udaykumar: Admiral Ramdas told me about the Kalpakkam project. Yorkshire TV in Britain managed to take a camera into some of these reactors and took a one hour documentary which is available now. And it tells the truth which is being hidden from us. Another point I want to make is that a woman who ruled the country for almost 16 years was transported, when she got shot, in the backseat of an Ambassador car. If that was the fate of one of the most powerful women in the world, I am really not confident of the safety measures that people are talking about. Pichumani: As someone who is still working in the US nuclear industry, I will not go into the merits of what you say, but I personally think that AID should not get involved in everything that is going on. As he pointed out this is something we have to leave to those who can handle it. In the US there is a Union of Concerned Scientists, a big organisation, it is their full time job, they are paid, not like AID volunteers. They have a hard time fighting with the government. So I strongly recommend that AID volunteers not get into this, at least not at this stage, we don’t have the resources, it is a very serious issue. Udaykumar: I agree with you – well I don’t agree with you, I think that AID volunteers should have the freedom to get involved or not. And I as a political science student who believes in civil society cannot afford to let a bunch of scientists decide on my future, my children’s future and my land. It is my home! Where will I go? |